CHAPTER VI
OTHER OFFICIAL MATTER
In this connection are presented various official matters, which although too brief to place in a chapter separtely, are too important to be entirely ignored. the items have been gathered from records and from interviews with those familiar with such matter.
MATRIMONIAL
This is a matter which often attracts attention when treated
historically. In vaious lands the marriage rite is solemnized in
different ways and by different ceremonies; in all, the acts of
the contracting parties must be understood by each, and by the
community in which they live as being a mutual agreement to hold
the relations toward one another as man and wife. In this State
a license has always been required; or in lieu thereof, for a
number of yeas, a couple could be married by publishing their
intentions through a public assembly, although in Iowa it was
never practiced to any great extent.
The first marriage that appears on the record books of the county was solemnized on August 14, 1853, more than thirty years ago. The parties were Miron Blodgett and Sarah Cronk. They were married by John C. Vermilya, County Judge. It was the first marriage solemnized in the county subsequent to its organization.In early days young men and maidens were not married in the grand style which usually characterizes marriages of the present time. They did not wait for riches to come before marriage, as in generally the present custom, but married and lived in simple and comfortable style, and generally lived happily and gained the respect of their neighbors by attending to their own business. There were no "diamond weddings" in those days and the extravagance that often now attends the marriage ceremony was unheard of. The old folks were plain, economical and hospitable people, and the young foks were imbued with the same attributes that characterized their fathers and mothers. They were willing to commence housekeeping in a style corresponding with their means, trusting to the future for larger houses and more expensive furniture.
There are many rich anecdotes of the rustic marriages in early days, but where possible they are treated in connection with the history of the townships in which they occurred. How, when the time came, the blushing and rosy maid, would drop her milk pails, throw off her apron and tying on her sun bonnet, clamber into the lumber box wagon, while "John" in his over-alls and farm boots would take up the whip, and the oxen would move off with the bridal procession to the "Squires" who did the "jining of the knot."
One of these anecdotes, which is not located and therefore cannot properly be placed in the townships, is here given. In an early day a young couple, fresh from the wilds of the frontier, sauntered into one of the pioneer villages, entered a store and confronting the proprietor, told him that "they wanted to get married." "Why, said the merchant, "I-I-can't do any marrying." "Well, if you can't, I'd like to know who can. We're goin' to get married, you bet" said the aspiring young bride-groom with a gushing look at the damsel at his side. "I tell you," said the merchant "you go over to the post-master, I think he can do the job for you." The young couple started off with great joy to find the man who could marry them. They found the postmaster and told them they had come to "git married." This rather dazed the mail man and he told them "he couldn't marry." "But," says the bride-groom," the man over there in that store said you could, and I guess he ought to know." "Well I guess he ought; that's so," said the post-master. "It seems to me that I've seen something about marrying somewhere in the instructions to postmasters. Yes, I guess that's all right." Accordingly the couple were ranged in front of him and in the most approved style he pronounced them "Mr. and Mrs., as provided by the U. S. postal regulations. Go your way, keep your mouths shut and you'll be happy." As they turned to leave, he remarked, "only a dollar a piece, please."
The following is a list of all the marriages that occurred in the county for the first few years after organization, as taken from the record in the office of the Clerk of Court:
Miron Blodgett and Sarah Cronk, married on August 14, 1853, by
John C. Vermilya County Judge.
Granville Dennis and Elizabeth Jane Shephard, December 4, 1853,
by Rev. S. W. Ingham.
Fred L. Knot and Martha Taylor, October 16, 1853, by Rev. S. W.
Ingham.
George Wier and Mary Jane Rush, December 25, 1853, by Judge J.
C. Vermilya.
George McChambers and Cordelia A. Lux, October, 16, 1853, by
Robert Wilkinson, Justice.
The marriages during the year 1854, were as follows.
Solomon W. Ingham and Cynthia Taylor, January 28, by Andrew
Coleman.
James W. Grant and Mary E. Wilkinson, April 13, by Rev. S.
Dunton.
Jacob Bruner and Susan Ashby, April 16, by John C. Vermilya,
County Judge.
Alpheus Goodpaser and Mary HIll, April 29, by John Connell, J.P.
Logan McChesney and Lucy A. Hancox, March 20, by a. Ladow
Licentiate.
Martin S. Slate and Charlotte M. Dingey, July 4, by Rev. Solomon
Dunton.
Joseph Riddle and Mary Ann Yoste, September 3, by J. C.
Vermilya, County Judge.
George W. Voorhies and Carlista J. Dingee, September 27, by John
C. Vermilya, County Judge.
Mark Webb and Catharine Voorhies, September 27, 1854, by John C.
Vermilya, Judge
William T. Hollen and Sarah Bruner, September 17, by Benjamin
Hammitt, J. P.
Joseph Davis and Rebecca Bruner, September 17, by Benjamin
Hammit.
James Gillen and Lydia Grover, October 11, by J. C. Vermilya,
County Judge.
George More and Mary Ann Howard, September 10, by N. B. Hyatt,
J. P.
Nathaniel E. Horton and Eunice Maryette Horton, October 26, by
John Connell, J. P.
Wm. Blodgett and Veteria A. Ladow, August 22, by A. Ladow,
Licentiate.
Hugh Hammitt and Nacy Zehrung, December 17, by John C. Vermilya,
County Judge.
George Carter and Phebe Ann Cronk, December 25, by John
Vermilya, County Judge.
John Zehrung and Mary E. Connell, November 26, by Rev. D. H.
Petefish.
Joseph A. Brown and Margaret Hill, December 3, by Rev. D. H.
Petefish.
The following is a list of the mariages for the year 1855,
without going so particularly into dates:
P. B. Hill and R. Dice by Rev. D. H. Petefish
William Blanchard and Sarah Wilkins, by N. B. Hiatt, J. P.
Jacob Yost and Sarah Ann Sparks, by John C. Vermilya, County
Judge.
John Allman and Julia K. Voorhies, by Rev. Wm. Arstrong.
William Leach and Elvina Helm by Tobias R.Shiner.
Harrison Wisehart and Elcy Ann Appelgate by John C. Vermilya.
Angelo A. Myers and Nancy Ross, by JohnC. Vermilya, County
Judge.
John Eakins and Sophyna L. Leonard, by John C. Vermilya, County
Judge.
Elias H. Price and Sarah Hatfield by Newton B. Hiatt, J.P.
P. L. Baldy and Asenith McChesney, by John C. Vermilya.
Robert Carter and Eliza Ross, by Judge Vermilya.
Truman Prindle and Emily M. Michael, by Judge Vermilya.
Hiram Pickett and Louisa E. Miner, by N. B. Hiatt, J.P.
David Hunnewell and Katharine Myers by Judge Vermilya.
Newton Sanders and Mary McDormand by Geo. S. Williams, J. P.
Elias Hatfield and Ellen S. Rich by Judge Vermilya.
Andrew J. Litell and Ann Hammett by Judge Vermilya.
William Randall and Marintha Riccard by John C. Vermilya, County
Judge.
Jacob C. Zehrung and Caroline Gettis by Judge Vermilya.
Albert Keneday and Sibel Harris, by Judge J. C. Vermilya.
Robert Foster and Nancy Hunter, by Rev. W. N. Brown.
Reuben Huffman and Maria Zehrung by Benjamin Hammitt.
Tyler Blake and Nancy J. Dairs, by Benjamin Hammitt, J. P.
Chas. T. Stewart and Mary A. Sadler, by Judge J. C. Vermilya.
Andrew Rorke and Sophia Earhurt, by Isaac Butler, J. P.
The list for 1856 materially increases as follows:
Newton F. Crosley and Rebecca J. Marvin.
Fredrick Frederich and Susanah Mitchell.
George Cook and Sarah House.
John D. Smith and Mary Mann.
Henry Wilson and Absila Boling.
Benjamin Rush and Rebecca Corfman.
Ephriam Jeffries and Catharine Ross.
Jess Hiopkins and Rebecca Myers.
George. Wyvill and Nancy Southard.
Elijah T. Rust and Julia K. Edwards.
James Pickett and Nancy Bennett.
William W. Davis and Eliza Jane Parker.
Cyrus Shelton and Mary Ann Southard.
John H. Carlton and Sarah Stoddard.
John Newton and Martha Arbuthnot.
Adam Zehrung and Dorcas Denison.
Isaiah Hunnewell and Minerva Chase.
Martin Richardson and Elizaebth McPheters.
Ephriam A. Suthard and Elizabeth Jordan.
Alpheus A. Harworth and Elizabeth Fee.
Horace A. Hartshorn and Philida Kyle.
Samuel Long and Eliza Early.
Henry C. Foster and Mary Jane Olthy.
John Bruebaker and Racheal Lamm.
J. S. Edmands and Malinda Shugart.
Francis M. Davis and Maartha Jane Applegate.
Charles Barnes and Harriet Hatfield.
Lorenzo R. Dobson ad Mary Judge.
Jonas P.Wood and Margaret Connell.
Riley Haworth and Melissa J. Fisher.
Mathias Travis and Rachael Davis.
Francis Henry and Sarah Myers.
John Connell and Catharine Graham.
Rezin Overturf and Henrietta Byron.
I. F. Drake and Rachael Overturf.
Elias H. Bownes and Elizabeht Powell.
T. J. Staley and E. J. Graham.
Alonzo Helm and Emily Recksten.
David Gillespie and Francis A. Harman.
J.C. Wood and Elizabeth Kile.
W. M. Dunlap and Fannie A. Johnson.
Andrew Hanna and Sarah J. Bates.
Geo. W. Shiner and Jennetter leffler.
Tiberius Donaldson and Emily A. Fay.
J. Williamson and Mary Richey.
J. L. Graham and A. Wood.
Samuel Walker and Arminda Paxon.
Aandrew McPheters and Rachael Abbott.
The following table shows the number of marriages contracted
form 1853 to 1883 inclusive:
1853...............5 | 1869................140 |
1854..............25 | 1870................151 |
1855..............27 | 1871................134 |
1856..............45 | 1872................125 |
1857..............37 | 1873................163 |
1858..............49 | 1874................150 |
1859..............49 | 1875................181 |
1860..............50 | 1876................195 |
1861..............41 | 1877................180 |
1862..............44 | 1878................176 |
1863..............50 | 1879................182 |
1864..............68 | 1880................180 |
1865..............80 | 1881................224 |
1866.............124 | 1882................204 |
1867.............115 | 1883 to April 1st....67 |
Total...............3,399 | |
A glance at the foregoing figures shows conclusively that the matrimonial market is affected by the state of the times. In 1857 hard times set in and the marriage list decreased in ration. Again in 1874, banks suspended and a season of depression set in and fewer marriages were contracted. The war too caused a falling off in the numbr of marriages annually contracted, but in 1866, when the boys got home the market at once jumped back to and above its normal condition.
ABSTRACT OF ASSESMENTS FOR TAMA COUNTY, FOR THE YEAR 1882.
No. of Acres, exclusive of Town Property........452,301
Value exclusive of Town Property...............$4,299,624
Total exemption for trees planted.................102,516
Total after deducting exemptions................$4,197,108
Aggregate value of Realty in towns..............551,073
Aggregate value of R. R. property...............380,840
Aggregate value of Personal Property
including horses and cattle......................1,400,573
Total valuation of Tama County...................6,529,594
REALTY VALUE IN TOWNS AND CITIES
Dysart...............$47,344
Chelsea...............18,052
Traer.................76,560
Toledo City..........120,382
Tama City............202,364
Gladbrook.............31,130
Garwin.................6,705
Montour...............29,159
Other small towns.....19,374
Total................551,073
VALUATION OF LIVE STOCK
Cattle assessed in the county.......31,917........$383,817
Horses assessed in the county.......11,670.........401,880
Mules assessed in the county...........543..........26,086
Sheep assessed in the county.........3,043...........3,376
Swine assess in the county..........37,115..........98,223
Total valuation..............................$910,382
COUNTY BUILDINGS
The first building really used for official purposes was the
house of John C. Vermilya, County Judge, which stood about
one-half mile east of the present site of Tama City. It was a
log building and there was not room it it scarcely for a jury to
sit. Judge Vermilya soon took proper steps for the erection of a
court house, and the contract was let to T. A.Graham for the sum
of $1,300. The court house was completed in the latter part of
1854, and was a commodious, two story frame building, which
stood on lot 2, in block 5, Toledo. This building served the
purpose until 1866, when it was sold.
During the year 1865, the people of Toledo agitated the question of a new court house, as it was realized that a larger one was needed. At a meeting held in Toledo, there was a Court House Association organized, with A. J. Free as secretary; and W. F. Johnston, W. H. Harrison, D. D Applegate, T. A. Graham, N. C. Wieting and G. R. Struble as trustees. The matter was ssettled and bids for the erection advertised for, upon plans and specifications submitted. P. B. McCullough, of Toledo, was the successful bidder, and he began the construction of the building. He failed to complete it, and H. B. Belden agreed to finish it under the contract. The cost of the building was a trifle over $22,000, of which all but about $5,000 was paid by the association, and it was donated to the county. The building occupies a fine site, standing near the center of Toledo, in the Public Park, and presents an elegant and imposing appearance. the grounds have been beautified by shade trees, which were planted years ago. The basement is of stone, the building is of brick and is roofed with corrugated iron. A large belfry surmounts the building. The first floor is divided into the county offices, the court room and office of the county superintendent occupy the upper story.
The county jail stands just northeast of the court house, and is a fine brick structure 30 X 34 feet, two stories in heighth. It was erected in 1869, and was first occupied in 1870. The upper story contains six pleasant rooms and is occupied by the jailor or sheriff and family. The lower story, or jail proper, contains a large wrought iron cage, 22 X 25 feet, with sleeping apartments, for the close confinement of prisoners. The outer door leading into the hall is also wrought iron, and the inner one is a grated door. The entire building is covered with a wrought iron roof.
TAMA COUNTY POOR FARM
At the general election in 1875, the proposition of purchasing a
poor farm and the reection of necessary buildings, was submitted
to the voters of Tama county. It carried by a large majority,
and the Board of Supervisors purchased of A. J. Wheaton, a tract
of one hundred and fifty acres in section two, township 83,
range 15, for $6,750. The contract for remodeling and enlarging
the building was awarded to the Tama Hydraulic and Builders'
Association, for $4,084.65, while Kent and Conklin were the
architects.
The house is on a high elevation, a dry and healthy location; it has been rebuilt and greatly enlarged, and various changes instituted. As the building appears from the road it is more suggestive of an Eastern suburban hotel, or something of that kind than a charitable institution. Its extreme length from north to south is 84 feet, its width varies, being, we believe, 24 feet and 34 feet. It is divided up into the rooms, kitchen, dining room, halls and bed rooms. It is so arranged tat there are three different stair-cases leading to the second story, so that in case of fire the upper story could be easily emptied of its occupants and contents, no matter in what locality the fire might be. The furniture is plain and substantial, though neat. Near the kitchen is an excellent well and a large cistern in which a force pump has been placed for proteciton against conflagration. The farm is well stocked with implements, and everything seems to be in good, healthy condition. The place is under the charge of Mr. Abel Child, who with the assistance of his amiable wife, seem to be the right people in the right places. It requires a peculiar disposition and manner to make a success of such an instituion, and Mr. and Mrs. Child seem to be possessed of that peculiarity.
There is a certain discipline required, which, while it is kind and gentle, must, at the same time, be strict enough to easily quell any refractory or perverse spirit which will at times show itself even under the most generous and favorable circumstance.
Mr. Child keeps the farm in business like manner, and each month makes out duplicate reports, one copy of which is filed intheAuditor's office, while the other is preserved for reference, either for himself or any one that many be visiting.
Tama Co. Home Page | Table of Contents | Biography List | Portrait List | Certificates | Chapter VII |